Should the Death Penalty be legal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Should the Death Penalty be legal - Essay grammatical caseThose who atomic number 18 against the use of capital punishment do not think that the government should be stipulation the authority to subject any of its people to death. They also say that this practice is overtly costly, racially incomplete and does not realize the in break awayed result. The vast majority of Americans consider the death penalization to be neither cruel nor unusual, quite the opposite they think its a fair and just punishment. They not simply accept but stridently insist that the ultimate punishment be sustained for several reasons which testament be thoroughly covered in this paper. It leave also take into account the opponents logic concerning wherefore it should be ended in an effort to show an inclusive summary of the contentious death penalty debate. History of Punishment Historically speaking, the justification for punishing offenders has been to avenge the crime, to protect society by impri soning the criminal, to monish that person and other potential offenders from the commission of crimes and to obtain reparations from the offender (Wolfgang, 1998). All through the history of civilization, this logical has not altered appreciably. The four fundamental reasons humanity punishes criminals can be classified by devil basic motivations. One is to obtain the desired outcome which includes protecting society, deterrence and seeking compensation. The other, retribution or vengeance involves reprimanding those who ingest committed a crime on society. For thousands of years people look at offer to retribution as validation for using the death penalty which can be found in the Biblical reference an nerve for an eye. In other words, self-asserting actions against society must be confronted with an aggressive punishment (Olen & Barry, 1996 268). This use of any type of punishment is humanitys method of striking fundament at a person or persons who have disturbed the ethi cal and emotional sensibilities of a society. The eye for an eye justification continues to be used by many people and nations today. Those who embrace this viewpoint atomic number 18 undoubtedly correct when they state that capital punishment assures that the offender will not be fitting to commit another transgression against society. The death penalty is the definitive preventative measure (Olen & Barry, 1996). Opponent shoes Persons who oppose use of the death penalty think that all life no matter how frightful should be considered of value and that putting a person in prison for life without the opportunity for intelligence is sufficient punishment. Opponents also believe that revenge as justification is wrong and in the end more than harmful to the values of society than is the crime of murder itself. Additionally, opponents think that banning the death penalty will allow opportunities for confronting those who had been hurt most and possibly encourage remorse or reconcil iation (and) suggest those that have killed be made to service the community as a way of partially making amend (Olen & Barry, 1967 272). According to opponents the death penalty is morally and ethically objectionable in modern society. Some are against it based on religious reasons referring to morality as the primary issue however, differing religions and the faithful within those religions have conflicting opinions. For example, Christians who live in America overwhelmingly support it while Christians in Europe tend to oppose it. Legal Interpretations The U.S. Supreme Court has maintained that use of the death